We are, of course, amazed that our readers occasionally disagree with our brilliant and witty essays. In fact, sometimes quite a few readers think that The Outrage editors are wrong, misanthropic, idiotic, selfish, deluded, or all of the above.

Mother Outrage always told us that even the dull and the ignorant should have their say, so we've allowed space below for those dissenting opinions (and for shameless flattery).

Read the 2nd set of comments about this Outrage!

Read the 3rd set of comments about this Outrage!

Read the 4th set of comments about this Outrage!

Read the 5th set of comments about this Outrage!

Read the 6th set of comments about this Outrage!

Read the 7th set of comments about this Outrage!

In my opinion The Clintons are just a couple of CROOKS! But can you really blame them? The UN-EDUCATED AMERICAN PUBLIC elected Bill for a second term! Now whos fault is that? When the population of a country elects crooks in high offices, that is bad enough, BUT LEARN FROM IT! DON'T PUT THEM IN AGAIN! What did you expect? Hell, They are crooks and YOU ELECTED them again. STUPID! STUPID! STUPID!

BC's fisrt actions in office were to reduce the strength and number of personnel in the armed services. Having recently enlisted and serving only a few months I was offered the opportunity to early discharge. I was infuriated by this and adamantly refused. Then just a few short months later I find myself in Iraq, how convenient for him. Put America's soldiers in harms way and watch as interest turns away from his indiscretions. I've never seen such an abuse of presidential power. Furthermore, as president he more than any other in history had the military fighting in multiple theaters of combat. Voters please wake up and think !!!

Of course he did! But in a way, I'm glad Sadam is suffering. On the other hand, I did want him out of office, but on another hand I'd hate Al Gore as president so it doesn't really matter.

Okay, old topic, just wanted to say that reading Jans comments above have given me insight as to just how much stupidity can be crammed into a females skull. Answer-a lot. Next time, vote with your brain, not your crotch, you damn cow. Oh yeah, I guess you must have done that already. Too bad.

As a mom of military son who may fight in Kosovo I have a few comments for our commander-in-heat.

1. When Chelsea goes, my son will go.

2. Will someone please get Clinton on Viagra? Now that Monica is gone (and hundreds like her) Clinton obviously needs to find Hillary attractive again. Then maybe he'll turn his sexual aggressiveness against his beloved wife instead of attacking a sovereign nation.

The man is insane and I intend to use all my resources that make sure my son's life in not sacrificied for Clinton's 'legacy'.

Wake up America! Why do we find Littleton so outrageous when our bombs are killing children, women and men on a daily basis? Is is because Littleton was on American soil and Kosovo is far away and only viewed from your television set?

Learn to think and discriminate for yourselves. Fight, fight, fight for what you believe is right.

I intend to.

United States has no business in the war over there, we should help the refugees but should not be into any fighting, this is their civil war and none of our business. This will turn into another Nam very soon. Glad my sons are over the military age..

Close, three republicans will vote no on both counts, and I will have to guess 6-8 will have to vote on more. But I think they do have a reasonable case- many prosecuters win cases based soley on circumstantial evidence. I would frame the facts like so: President says under oath that he didn't have sexual relations, and sat there as his lawyer said to the court he had no relations of any sexual nature whatsoever.-DNA Dress. Says to Grand Jury- I only told things to my friends that were true- Blumenthall is under oath as stating the President outright lied. One of them committed purjery. Next: Betty Curry wants Monica's stuff back. Why? She did it on her own? Next on obstruction- the job search by Jordon- for fun? Pretty strong case of circumstantial evidence. But this wasn't even a trial. Honestly, I think a lot of Republicans are more worried about their jobs than they are about principal. I don't know if this is a good thing or bad thing. Our founding fathers not only warned of tyranny of the majority, but they also warned of tyranny of the minority. The whole purpose of a congress is to have a group of people who don't bend with every turn in the wind direction. This is no longer so. If Congress is to become nothing more than a group of people who only vote based on opinion poles, we need to fire them all and have electronic populist votes. Anyway, I think too many in the republican party copped out. That's the sad thing. I think that if they truly believe this guy comitted impeachable offences, then they should vote their concience. I can't quite figure out if Clinton is the most brilliant communticator or if republican PR people are just complete morons. I think it's a little of both. Wow. WHat a country. I just want this nightmare of the Clinton Presidency to be over.

The evidence presented on TV in the Senate trial over the weekend was weak and inconclusive -- not enough to convict. This is my fair objective view of the arguments presented. Have a feeling almost all Democratic and some GOP senators will acquit the President. The final vote IMO may be as follows:

44 Democrats -- total acquital 6 Republicans -- total acquital 12 Republicans -- partial acquital (1 count off, 1 count on) 1 Democrat -- no acquital 37 Republicans -- no acquital

This doesn't mean I side with the guy. I don't. I just think the case is too weak to warrant all the time and money spent. For an ordinary guy, the case would have been thrown out before getting to the grand jury. It is political dare and thrillsmanship that got it to where it is today. As for the guy pulling the trigger on Iraq, he blinked and swerved in this stupid game of 'who'd chicken first'.

I don't know where this information is gotten from , but the President cannot start a war that was already in progress before this crap started. Second of all the President alone cannot start a war on his own, that is part of the check and balance part of the Government...As for his private life that is no one business, if he does have a black child, so what look at how many of different races that is floating around that the men or you don't take responsiblity for so don talk that bull, that is not any of your business.... Besides Monica was also doing one of the Republican Senators as well. The problem is that those that don't like the man because he was able to do what no republican President was able to do. I didn't hear complaints when Regan was doing the same thing in the office...plus Nancy was doing it all because mentally he wasn't able to do. She told him what to say and do, and she had to write it down, it was like playing a role in one of his "B" movies.....By the way there is going to be an investigation into Starr and Linda Tripp....smoke on that for a while. By the way if the women didn't let him know they were available he would not have done it with them, it takes two to tango, in that there is no innoncent party!!!!

No. In order to have a trial, you must have witnesses. As far as future motions, there is no real possibilty of future motions. Democrats may want to censure Clinton so that they can at least go on record as stating his actions were "reprehensible", but the Republicans probably won't go for it. There is no constitutional grounds for it, and what more could be really done. There is of course the hopes that Lewinski has become less happy with Clinton, and will be even harder on him, particularly since they will hear some testimony on Clintons attempts to destroy Lewinski's credibility, which, if she believes, may make her more inclined to burn Bill. But time will tell.

Has it crossed the mind of anyone here that calling Lewinsky over to the Senate to stand as a witness can infer a LACK of thoroughness in Ken Starr's investigation and data collection? Have all those millions of dollars paid to him gone to waste for a sloppy and incomplete job? Or is calling for witnesses to the Senate a desperate attempt by the GOP to find new clues and evidence to start a fresh inquiry -- sort of a bait and hook for future motions in case this impeachment comes short of the two-thirds vote? Please flame.

Thanks,Nosey. I honestly wish Bill Clinton didn't make me so sick sometimes. But he does. It was enjoyable raving about Clinton to you, or at least I feel better somehow. I only hope he hasn't damaged the presidency or democratic tradition too badly. I guess if we survived too see the last rotting vestages of the Kennedy clan fall from grace everywhere but Massechussets , we can weather anything. Oh, well, I'll listen to an Alan Keyes speach and it'll make me feel better.

Carl,

I agree wholeheartedly with you. He should resign the moment he does anything unbecoming in the Oval Office. He should not even run for the presidency knowing his own weaknesses and past sins. For him to take up the office and subject a country and her institutions and people to great risk and embarassment is bordering on selfishness and self-denial. He should just go -- he has already lost his face, and while losing his face he has defaced the Office of the Presidency.

No, I'm no saint, not in the colloqueal sense anyway, but no, I'm no child mollester, and I haven't married yet, although I have always been faithfull in relationshios with women while I was in them. Not that any of this is relevant. I am no big defender of Barrs, I only point out that his indiscretions were not public ones. My only point is that we should have a higher standard than a president who holds our private FBI files because he doesn't like who we are or what we stand for. I have a problem with using government employees in cover ups, Giving job for 'jobs (a new clinton program) or giving away national security for campaign contributions. I think any republican would agree that while this is impeachable, we wish he could have been caught on obstruction in so many other matters, or for China gate or filegate, there are too many dead people who have challenged this man, and there are too many government employees that have spent their time covering up, intimidating, or assisting in completely unconstitutional goals. The American people at large must understand that we are the protectors and defenders of the Constitution, we dictate politicians values by accepting them or denying them. It was once said you get the government you deserve. If our polititcians are all dirtbags (and I don't believe all of them are) then it is because we have tolerated it. When will America realize that we must demand responsibility, that Presidents command awesome responsibility, and do many things that the American public must never hear about- for our own good- and that we must therefore have a relitively honest individual making decisions not for personal gain, but for the good of the nation. We have a president who wouldn't pass a background check to work in the post office. He is a hypocryte (for firing two generals for commiting adultery) and probably a two bit thug who has strongarmed his way through his career. This is beyond reprehensible- it is dangerous, and all the rules of conduct in America have been rewritten since this man has taken power. It's time for us to have someone who doesn't hate the military who serves him, someone who hasn't had half of his friends convicted or indicted, someone who isn't for sale, someone who can chose a cabinet that doesn't break the law, someone who doesn't want international drug dealers over at the whitehouse for christmass,someone who can keep it in his pants so he doesnt have to kill off half the female population just to stay in office. You know, Jimmy Carter wasn't a great President in my eyes, but I'm still proud he was my president. He was a good decent, honest man. True, you can't elect gomer pyle president just because he's wholesome, but you can't elect hitler president just because he's bright. We need a ballence, and we need presidents- people who are citizens accountable to our laws, who break laws at will- not a King who can do no wrong.

First I would have to say that I agree with the outrage. Not only did the president put American soldiers in danger, but he broke Article 1 section 8 clauses 10 and 11 of the constitution, in that Congress has the right to declare war. Bombing a nation is declaring war.

Now I'm pretty sure that you are no saint. And I'm not one either. Tell me this...how many times have you been unfaithful to your wife? Or are you a typical child molester hiding behind a keyboard? Or perhaps a deadbeat dad?

I'm not supporting anyone in D.C. unlike your zeal about Barr. If you preach all these wuzzy fuzzy righteous goodness politics, then the blind support of any politician makes you a suspect. The bottom line is - I don't support any politician -- not Barr, not Clinton, not Hyde, not Gephardt. Never. They are all scumbags.

And they all represent the middle-age white men of America -- unfortunately we are part of that group -- with a nasty record. This single group of men has the highest number of divorcees, adulterers, deadbeat dads, child molesters, porno addicts, hate societies, etc. This group is probably the most hypocritic group in the good ole USA. I'm not abashed about it -- that's why I'm proud of Larry. At least he says who he is, without hiding behind a facade of righteousness and holiness.

Barr Was accused of taking a geogia code simalar to the fifth when asked about an afair, he did not deny it. Not that this excuses infedelity- if you can't honor your word to the one person that should be able to trust you, how can taxpayers trust you- but- you ignored the obvious point of abuse of power, and doing the nasty on company time. But ignore this for a moment- arent you concerned about the real crimes like trading arms to communist china for contributions. OR holding hundreds of FBI Files? Sure if you don't care which employees you are paying for clinton to screw, you won't care which bedroom is for sale, but man, there is a stench of dead bodies, mutilated kittens, slashed tires and roughed up folks that rots it's way from little rock to the whitehouse. Its true. Don't you care? Isn't that wrong? Unjust? DO you support THAT? Is this what our cheif diplomat is supposed to do? Beat up women and smear them at will because he can't keep it in his pants and then sell out (and cheep I say) to communist countries just to stay in power? What ever happened to one having the ambition of leading this country and bringing its sons prosperity, nosy? When was it replaced by personal ambition of the most molevolent kind withonly personal gain in mind and callous disregaurd for any lives that stand in the way? That nosy is what I am talking about. If we sit here and say I don't presuppose to hold anyone in washington to any standard, then how are we ever going to get decent polititions? Is it their jobs to be dirtbags who degrade us all and drag our nation through the mud with the likes of Careville and Flynt leading the charge??????? I hope you can respond to this nosey- I am curious to see if you care about how our country is being led and if corruption and greed are in themselves offensive to you or not. I am curious. (I am not being mean and sarcastic either) Also- who said private court, anyway?

Btw, I'm no democrat. Those people scare me. And I'm no republican either. They scare me more.

Oh yeah. Barr has perjured himself when he lied in a court of law about his infidelity and sexual activity during divorce proceedings. His many ex-wives are witnesses. Everytime a court is used or abused for personal or private matters, taxpayer money is spent. There is no such thing as a private court - unless you're referring to the tennis court or courtyard in your house.

Kudoes to larry flynt you say? Oh my God Democrats have sunk tooo low now. It is low enough when the President has a hit squad of goons (no, I'm not talking about the ones who threatened or killed cats, or slashed tires, or who knows what else in the trail of 40 or 50 some odd dead bodies that goes from litle rock to DC, I am talking about muck rakers) the likes of James Carville, but when James gets his Hustler pal to dredge up dirt, it's sad. But there is something significant in this revelation of flynts- Barr never purgered himself. We can also assume that Barr never did this on public time or that his mistriss was being payed by us at the time. Also, I doubt the affair took place in a public building, or involved forcing other public servants to cover up. I also doubt that Barr caused the American public 40 Million Dollars either. SO I am glad we have now such a clear comparrison between public abuse of power and private misdeed. And I am glad that Clinton has stooped even lower (if that's possible).

Kudos to Larry Flynt!! The true blue independent counsel who brings hypocrites and self-righteous politicians out of their immoral closets. We need more brave men like Larry.

Congratulstions for noticing the blatent use of our soldiers lives for Clinto's own political gain, but guess what folks, virtually every action was done clearly for personal use, not national security. Example, just prior to this, Clinton bombs an aspirine factory, and attacks a training center that should have been hit for gp LONG AGO. This in response to terrorist attacks the likes of which Clinton ignored numerous times before. This latest one was particularly blatent, considering, that Scott Ritter was screaming about the necessity for real invasion long ago. The same liberals who lauged at Ritters judgement merley because he was the man on the ground, and not "Riding in the Limousines and making the paygrade" that Maddeline Allbrite enjoyed, were now saying " it was a necessity, these people could make a new batch of biological weapons every thirty days" ( which means Bill ignored 12 batches before he did his token bombing. But still, Bosnia? Somolia? Helping dirtbags in Haiti? I quote one soldier who left the 82 ABN after somolia when his time went out, "The bad guys were impossible to tell. Sometimes it was the soldiers in uniform raping and plundering which we couldn't move in to stop, and other times, it was plundering civilians who we could not shoot at until we took casualties." This draft dodger has always used military action of no pertinent interest to Americans at home or abraod until he got into a fix. Practically every operation concides with a major scandle date or crises time for clinton. This is not even to mention his giving missile technology to china all "in the American interests" only shortly after recieving 600,000 smackeroos from the American company which he allowed to do it, and 3,000,000 from red chineese military leaders, all donated and greatfully accepted through bhudist monks who had taken a vow of povery or through clintons china connentions like wong and tree (insert own jokes about wong and tree here). This man is a clear traitor, and this is what we should be trying him for. Unfortunately, the traitor attourney General, despite huge objections from her many of her own top underlings, has refused to look into a situation in which when congress bungled hearings by imposing time limits, scores of witnesses either plead the fifth or leave the country. Clinton is more than merely a womanising, using, embarrasment to his office. his people his word, and his family, but he is a traitor that is for sale (and cheap, too) to any bidder- bhudist monks and communist chinese included. At any other time in our moral history, save perhaps the late sixties, Clinton would have been punted long ago, and all his boot licking followers know it.

Is Iraq really the danger in the Mid-East ???

Q: Which country alone in the Middle East has nuclear weapons? A: Israel.

Q: Which country in the Middle East refuses to sign the nuclear nonproliferation treaty and bars international inspections? A: Israel.

Q: Which country in the Middle East seized the sovereign territory of other nations by military force and continues to occupy it in defiance of United Nations Security Council resolutions? A: Israel.

Q: Which country in the Middle East routinely violates the international borders of another sovereign state with warplanes and artillery and naval gunfire? A: Israel.

Q: What American ally in the Middle East has for years sent assassins into other countries to kill its political enemies (a practice sometimes called exporting terrorism)? A: Israel.

Q: In which country in the Middle East have high-ranking military officers admitted publicly that unarmed prisoners of war were executed? A: Israel.

Q: What country in the Middle East refuses to prosecute its soldiers who have acknowledged executing prisoners of war? A: Israel.

Q: What country in the Middle East created 762,000 refugees and refuses to allow them to return to their homes, farms and businesses? A: Israel.

Q: What country in the Middle East refuses to pay compensation to people whose land, bank accounts and businesses it confiscated? A: Israel.

Q: In what country in the Middle East was a high-ranking United Nations diplomat assassinated? A: Israel.

Q: In what country in the Middle East did the man who ordered the assassination of a high-ranking U.N. diplomat become prime minister? A: Israel.

Q: What country in the Middle East blew up an American diplomatic facility in Egypt and attacked a U.S. ship in international waters, killing 33 and wounding 177 American sailors? A: Israel.

Q: What country in the Middle East employed a spy, Jonathan Pollard, to steal classified documents and then gave some of them to the Soviet Union? A: Israel.

Q: What country at first denied any official connection to Pollard, then voted to make him a citizen and has continuously demanded that the American president grant Pollard a full pardon? A: Israel.

Q: What country on planet earth has the second most powerful lobby in the United States, according to a recent Fortune magazine survey of Washington insiders? A: Israel.

Q: Which country in the Middle East is in defiance of 69 United Nations Security Council resolutions and has been protected from 29 more by U.S. vetoes? A: Israel.

Q: What country is the United States threatening to bomb because "U.N. Security Council resolutions must be obeyed?" A: IRAQ.

ARROWS FOR THE DRAGON

IN the early 1990s newly formed Russia and old guard China cut a deal. Russia would send advanced SA-10 Grumble, surface to air, missiles to China for money. At the time the deal seemed prudent for both parties all around. Russia was strapped for cash, and China had just witnessed American airpower dismember a larger Iraqi force equipped with Chinese weapons. This little known billion dollar arms deal set a whole world into motion. China suddenly recognized that their arsenal of aging Soviet knock-off weapons would be obsolete in less than a decade. The massive People's Army would be helpless in the face of superior US technology which could immobilize the giant with pin-point accuracy. A vulnerable China acted in her own self interest to shore up her aging missile forces. The exchange of firepower took place and soon the Chinese were producing their own SA-10s. New arrows to arm the dragon.

In an effort to improve their vast forces the Chinese began to look outwards toward other technologies from the former Russian super-power and the (tm) sole remaining world power, America. For example, last year Ukrainian police arrested a Chinese technician who had obtained plans to one of the most powerful missiles on Earth, the massive,nuclear tipped, Satan ballistic missile. These plans included details of the Satan multiple warhead technology. The MIRV designs could greatly improve China's long range nuclear missile force and multiply the number of nuclear warheads aimed at the US in their arsenal from ten or twenty to well over one hundred.

Other outlines of this techno-espionage home shopper's club became known in 1994 when Pentagon intelligence officials grew concerned over US Patriot technology being leaked to China. It quickly became apparent that the Chinese had incorporated some of the finer features of Patriot into their SA-10 copies, greatly improving it's performance, in particular, against aircraft. These concerns were passed on to then Secretary of Commerce, Ron Brown. In response to those concerns the Clinton administration took no action to stop US technology from being sold.

However, arrows sometimes fall into the wrong places. Several articles appeared in Aviation Week and Space Technology alleging Israel had also leaked missile technology to China. At one point, DRAGONAIR, an airline part owned by the Chinese government and part owned by Moctar Riady, was fined for carrying a live Chinese missile as cargo while also flying passengers. The missile, and the airliner full of people, was bound for Israel. It was enclosed in a mislabeled box and partially dismantled. Again, the advanced Russian missile was destine to be improved with US and Israeli seeker technology. Again, the Clinton administration choose to ignore the warnings.

To many the the connection between China and Israel seems like an odd coupling but in reality their relationship goes back to the eighties and the Iran/Iraq war. China and Israel supplied arms to both sides. In fact, President Reagan okayed a sale of Israeli gun sights, based on US technology, to China for tanks that would equip Iraq. China and Israel played middlemen as massive amounts of equipment were sent to either Iraq or Iran. China and Israel were conduits and industrial producers, far from the watchful eyes of voters and investors in America, that could be used to smuggle T-55 tanks to one side and TOW missiles to the other. The official American policy of stalemate would alternate, depending on circumstances, to stop either side from winning or losing.

The nineties, however, were quite different. The Department of State and the Pentagon approached the GAO in 1995 with a request to study the Commerce Department approval of dual use technology sales to China. The GAO report concluded that Ron Brown had more or less opened the door to everything but the kitchen sink. Secretary Brown's Far East commerce trips corresponded with each new batch of approvals for dual use, advanced US technology. The assertions by Mr. Brown that the US products would be monitored behind the bamboo curtain were simply pipe dreams since the Chinese would not allow such follow ups. This report is available here on the Internet at the GAO web site:

* GAO - Government Accounting Office web site. * At the Federation of American Scientists.

In late February, 1996, the Chinese Warlords were finally able to buy their way into the White House when Wang Jun entered for a coffee with President Clinton. Wang would donate $690,000 to the Democratic National Committee in a quiet effort to reward those who have helped China. Wang, a son of the ruling class in China, had far more than a few checks in his pocket. Wang has also been accused of attempting to smuggle 2,000 fully automatic AK-47s to Florida drug gangs. Wang Jun's history as an arms dealer is world renowned. It was Wang who set up the original delicate deal with Russia to buy the SA-10 Grumble. Wang was among a host of other unsavory characters to pass through the White House and leave a check. Wang's credentials as a dealer in billion dollar weapontry were well established long before 1996.

Today, President Clinton says he knew nothing of all this.

Is he serious? Are not missiles and world domination the very essence of Presidential power? Did the warnings issued over the last few years by various sources, ranging from the GAO to the Pentagon, fall on deaf ears at the White House? One would expect the President would at least familiarize himself with people he was about to meet. A simple briefing on Wang Jun would have set alarm bells off in a heartbeat. In fact, his administration took the money and went back to sleep. Like a guard-dog bribed with a t-bone steak the Clinton administration ignored the threat and took the cash. Now US pilots are tracked by Chinese missiles equipped with US technology and US cities are threatened by nuclear tipped missiles guided by US science.

Arrows stolen from the Eagle's quiver to arm the Dragon.

Ronald Reagan, held the presidency in such honor and reverence that he was never in the Oval Office without a coat and tie.  Bill Clinton has such disrespect for the presidency that he was often in the Oval Office without his pants. Behold the leader of 'the most (un)ethical administration in history' -  

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Ronald Reagan has a building and an airport in his name.)

(George Bush has the new CIA headquarters in his name.)

A Partial listing of suitable Memorials considered in honor of Clinton:

Renaming the Blue Plains sewage treatment facility after Mr. Clinton.

Renaming all the park portal-potties "Clinton Depositories."

The Capital Grille to "Bill Clinton's Grand Jury Cafeteria."

The FBI crime lab to the "William Jefferson Clinton DNA Lab."

Department of Justice to the "Clinton Department of Just Us."

D.C. Jail to "Clinton Clink."

Smithsonian's first lady's evening gown collection to "Monica's Dress Display."

Interstate 495 loop to the "Bill Curve."

D.C. General Hospital to "I Feel Your Pain Treatment Center."

Communist Red-Chinese Embassy to "Clinton Embassy."

Ellipse to "Elusive."

Chinese Laundry (9th Street NW) to "Bill's Chinese Laundry."

------------------------------------------------------

What will be the title of the movie made about the Clinton administration? asks the Washington Times.

Here are a just a few of the (printable) responses:

Truth and Consequences Citizen Stain Prince of Ties The Bad News Bares Dumb and Dumber Lady and the Tramp Apackolies The Big Lewinsky Dial M for Monica Willy Wonka and the Cigar Factory Saving Private Lyin' Easy Liar The Lying King Free Willy Animal Spouse Terms of Impeachment he Wizard of Odds Hip, Hip, Beret The Full Monica Romancing the Phone Tiepanic Sex, Lies on Videotape Sex, Ties and Audiotape Waiting to Inhale The Eight Commandments Neither an Officer nor a Gentleman Honey, I Shrunk the Presidency The Me Lie Massacre Bedtime for Bubba Sayonara

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From a 1974 speech by Clinton, innovator of 'the most [un]ethical administration in history':

"Yes, the president (Richard M. Nixon) should resign. He has lied to the American people, time and time again, and betrayed their trust. He is no longer an effective leader. Since he has admitted guilt, there is no reason to put the American people through an impeachment. He will serve absolutely no purpose in finishing out his term; the only possible solution is for the president to save some dignity and resign." --William J. Clinton,-1974(how about you Bubba?)

AND........

(Hillary Rodham Clinton (co-wife) was a member of the hordes of far-left Federal Lawyers attempting to smear, impeach and/or force then-President Richard M. Nixon out of office!)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "it doesn’t matter where he drops his pants, it’s where he drops his bombs ..."

STARR I ARE -- (a newly discovered tale of Dr Seuss )

I'm here to ask As you'll soon see -- Did you grope Miss Lewinsky?

Did you grope her In your house? Did you grope Beneath her blouse?

I did not do that Here or there-- I did not do that Anywhere!

I did not do that Near or far -- I did not do that Starr-You-Are

Did you smile? Did you flirt? Did you peek Beneath her skirt?

And did you tell the girl to lie When called upon To testify?

I do not like you Starr-You-Are -- I think that you Have gone too far

I will not answer Any more -- Perhaps I will go Start a war!

The public's easy To distract -- When bombs are Falling on Iraq!

I agree

I agree

Yes, I am outraged but about the only thing it going to get you is hight blood pressure. There is a goal of the elite and both Republican and Democrats are all on the same side. When people of my generation are dead, there won't be any hope for freedom, or at least freedom as I allways think and taught it to be. They now teach the young people different meaning to what we grow up beleiving. Clinton has always beem a slim and it seems slimmy things are in for most the country. Best advice for free thinkers is "Keep your powder dry".

I find it interesting that simultaneous bombings took place on American Embassies in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam on the eve of other important revelations connected to this sorry affair. Could the tail have been wagging from that early on in the game? Someone needs to do the research...

i would like to thank you for finally (not that you haven't done so all along), doing what no one else seems able to do and just coming out with the bald truth about clinton and his character as revealed in his recent action on iraq. he is a ruthless power junkie (i didn't inhale) who will do anything to save his own ass, no matter what the consequences, just so long as he comes out on top. thanx for doing a great job, and keep feeding the rage.

To the best of my knowledge, the military advised on the attack and Clinton accepted their advice. I am appalled at this continuing idiocy, trying to badger an unfaithful man from office when the public sees no better alternative (that's the CRIME). Pierre Trudeau, while Prime Minister of Canada, stated that the state has no business in the bedrooms of the nations, and that was probably one of the wisest political statements made in generations. There is a lot of controversy out there, but there are two very basic truths: Clinton is seen as being a very good President and his policies and programs have the support of the public (if not the Republican Party, which has tried to thwart any progressive programs that might serve to take the burdens off the masses (like medicare). The second truth is that Iraq is a virulent state (yes, it is because it's ruler is a virulent man and no one can shake him from the top) that is bent on destruction of its neighbors, the Israelis and ultimately the US and it's allies. Get your heads out of the sand and realize that if this proliferation of chemical, germ and conventional weapons is not stopped, we will eventually feel them used against us in North America. We tried to ignore Hitler and look where that led. The problem is that the US is trying to juggle the power and didn't wipe out Iraq (and Saddam) when the opportunity was presented because of fears of Iran. Nuff said.