We are, of course, amazed that our readers occasionally disagree with our brilliant and witty essays. In fact, sometimes quite a few readers think that The Outrage editors are wrong, misanthropic, idiotic, selfish, deluded, or all of the above.
Mother Outrage always told us that even the dull and the ignorant should have their say, so we've allowed space below for those dissenting opinions (and for shameless flattery).
Name: Jerry Martin (jm3@snet.net)
Time: 9/16/97 (19:49:47)
Outrage would be mild for this smuck, sucking slime ball called Kitty. Boycott the bookstores and the publisher. I wonder if Kitty is one of the illegimate children of King Philip. It is more likely that she is the offstring of a test tube and it wasn't sterilized before it was used.
Name: Jean Carbonneau (jcarb@omnisystem.com)
Time: 9/16/97 (19:0:11)
It's truly unfortunate that this type of garbage is printed but this is America, and we have the First Amendment. Princess Diana was not a royal, but rather a fly in the ointment to the Windsors. She was a strong willed woman who took it and finally told the Windsors to kiss where the sun doesn't shine. The best thing that the public can do is to not the book, but people still buy the Star and the Enquierer, so it doesn't seem to likely that people won't buy the book.
Name: Alfred Britton (albrit@trib.com)
Time: 9/16/97 (12:35:0)
Suppy and Demand, not free speech is the problem. People buy this garbage same as porn, people want it and will pay to get it. Nothing is sacred, except the great Bill Clinton. Note the number of not news articles about his excesses. Power has it's privilages.
Sorry for the childrens pain this garbage will cause, only liable suits stop this type of thing and then not very well.
People need to get a life, so they do not have to wreck or feed on the carniage of others lives.
Name: L.S. Burns (lsb@iscweb.com)
Time: 9/16/97 (11:17:52)
A campaign of decency should be started across the net...boycott any bookstore that tries to sell this swill ans then some!!!!
Rage Back!