Headline from Reuters article: "CLINTON SAYS FATHERS VITAL TO CHILDREN"
This is news? During the last several thousand years of civilization,
most people have pretty well understood that kids need fathers and
mothers. If this is a trend, perhaps we'll also see the following
shocking headlines in the near future:
"MANY MEN ATTRACTED TO PRETTY WOMEN"
"SOME WOMEN SEE WEALTH AS IMPORTANT FACTOR IN SELECTING HUSBAND"
"GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS SOMETIMES FAIL"
In his radio address of June 17 Clinton said "Research now confirms
that involvement of both parents in a child's education makes a positive
difference; and that father involvement during infancy and early
childhood also contributes to a child's emotional security". Really?
And did we need researchers to tell us this? Grandmother Outrage would
have been happy to explain the benefits of family life to anyone who
would listen, and at no charge.
Of course, any time a politician makes a profound discovery, they also
find a correspondingly innovative way of spending your money. Once
Clinton discovered that fatherhood was a good thing, he proposed a
$255,000,000 program called "Fathers Work, Children Win". The problem,
according to the Clinton administration, is that "many fathers can't
provide financial and emotional support to their children, not because
they're deadbeat, but because they're dead broke."
We are intrigued by Clinton's statement, for a number of reasons. First
of all, we didn't realize that providing emotional support required
money. I guess that if a man is insolvent he can't say "I love you" to
his child. We don't have any government-sanctioned research to prove
this, but the fact that millions of poor but very proud parents have
provided love and affection to their children seems to dissolve the
insoluble link between money and love.
Next, we were left wondering about the fact that so many fathers need
government help to find work. Perhaps we can save taxpayers a few
hundred million dollars with the following helpful instructions as to
how to find work:
- Walk down the street
- Look into the offices and shops
- Note that most of these offices and shops have large "Help Wanted"
signs
- Apply for work at the places with "Help Wanted" signs
(Note to Outrage readers: In order to develop the 4-step instructions
above, we employed 322.5 researchers and extremely complex computer
modeling; lots of custom software. To help us defray our costs, please
feel free to send checks - in million dollar increments only - to PO
Box 970, Leesburg, VA 20178)
Given the fact that we are now in the country's longest economic
expansion, with unemployment at the lowest levels in decades, the only
way someone can avoid finding a job is by walking around wearing a
tee-shirt saying "Under no circumstances will I accept gainful
employment, and any attempt to make me do so will result in a lawsuit."
But we're sure we're missing something here, so in order to unravel the
mystery we did a little math. As a result of the $255 million program,
Clinton says that 40,000 fathers might find work, and thus be able to
make their child support payments. But, even using Clinton's optimistic
forecasts, the cost of the program works out to $6,375 per father. If
the purpose of the program is to help children, maybe we could just give
the money directly to the children. After all, how many of these
fathers are really going to provide an additional $6,375 to their
children as a result of this program?
Finally, we have to admit that we're touched by Bill Clinton leading a
program on fatherhood. Perhaps his next initiative, co-sponsored with
Ted Kennedy, will be on marital fidelity. We could also get other
leaders involved in lighting a path for the rest of us. Al Gore could
sponsor a bill on increasing the nation's cache of dynamic public
speakers. Jane Fonda could lead a program on national loyalty; Pat
Buchanan could expound on expanding economic opportunities in the new
global village, Janet Reno could talk about helping leading American
tech companies achieve global dominance; Oprah could tell us how to
maintain a low profile, and Mike Tyson could lecture on living well on a
fixed income.
READ ALL ABOUT IT!
Read the article "Clinton Says Fathers Vital to Children"
See more Outrageous examples of Clinton's Follies