Free Outrages By E-mail!

More...


Search Outrage Archive!


Outrageous
Quote


WORLD
NET DAILY


Visit Free-Market.Net, for freedom


Members
Only


Our Rage on
Your Page


Spread the
Rage


Fight Spam


Suggest an
Outrage


Recent Rage


Outrageous
Essays


Comments
to the Editor


Outrage
Relief


Free Outrages By E-mail!

More...


Search the
Outrage
Library

or
 
The Outrage Title Graphic


TAX TIME!

Image of today's outrage

We thought we'd lighten up the remarkably dull process of doing our taxes by sharing a few random thoughts with our faithful readers. On the bright side, the Tax Simplification Act was passed a few years ago - they're bound to have worked out all the kinks by now. So it's time for The Outrage editors to do our own taxes. No problem - we'll whip these things out in a half-hour.


Line 9 - Hmmm... Ordinary dividends - Nope, we never expected that company to pay us anything at all - those must have been extraordinary dividends. Maybe schedule D.

Line 12 - Business income (or loss). Well, we published The Outrage again in 99. There aren't any limits on losses are there?

Where does the gambling income go? Same place as capital gains on publicly traded Internet companies? Gotcha.

Line 19 - Unemployment compensation - You can get paid for being unemployed? Seems like the Wendy's down the street is always looking for help, and every other business seems to be hiring. We're missing something on this one.

Line 20a - Let's see, we pay into Social Security so that Mother Outrage and Grandma Outrage can have some more money, despite the fact that they never paid into the system. No problem - We'll probably inherit that money back. Do we have to pay estate taxes when the money we paid into Social Security is recycled to us? Wouldn't it be easier if we just mailed our elders some cash, and then they could mail it back later?

Line 22 - Total Income - Can this be a negative number?

Line 29 - Keogh and self-employed SEP and SIMPLE plans - Simple retirement plans? Not likely.

Line 35a - Item to consider for next year - Deduction for marrying a 66-year-old blind woman.

Line 36 - Can we claim Sheba, the Outrageous cat, as a deduction? We feed and house her, and she has more redeeming virtues than a large portion of the voting population. Also, much better behaved than most children - never cusses us out. (Unless, of course, we're late with the Tender Vittles.)


Time to take a smoke break. Holy cow, these things are expensive. Almost forgot that cigarette taxes have gone up another 10 cents a pack. Not to worry; soon, thanks to liability litigation, we won't be able to buy them at all.

While smoking, happened to notice a telephone bill lying on the desk. Seemed unusually high, so we took a closer look: Federal subscriber line charge, local number portability surcharge, FCC line port charge, public rights of way use fee, federal tax, local tax; sales tax on a new line installation. But what really caught our attention was our "contribution" (mandatory) to the Universal Service Fund. But hey, this is America, and we know that the founders guaranteed the right of everyone to yap on the phone, forever, be they rich or poor.


Back to work:

Line 43 - Child Tax Credit - Maybe we should have a few kids. Can men get Aid for Dependent Families? We're already paying real estate taxes to educate all the neighborhood children. We could even get married - drastic step - and get a bigger deduction. And, later, isn't alimony deductible?

Line 50 - Self-employment Tax - Jeez, is this one high! Tell us again why we have to pay double Social Security tax if we work for ourselves? So the government will have plenty of money to take care of us in our old age? Check.

Hey, does this line include Medicare tax? Isn't this the one that funds Medicare fraud? If old people need their sex lives recharged, can they use Medicare to pay for Viagra? Hope so. But I think our local property taxes already cover swing dancing for seniors.

Capital Gains and Losses - (Note: this is as of December 31, 1999, not April 14, 2000. Pity.)

Let's see, if we double reverse our passive section 1231 income gain against our allowable passive loss from form 8582, then take the AMT Section 1231 PAL carryover from 1998, put it all in a bag, dance like a dervish to the latest Incinerators tune, and chant James Brown lyrics to the dark forces, we should get a depreciation adjustment for post 1986 schedule C carryovers.

Sorry, getting a little carried away here.

Foreign Tax Credit - Well, we're certainly glad that we didn't have dividends from a DISC (or former DISC), or, for that matter, distributions from a FSC (or former FSC). And we narrowly escaped having income re-sourced by treaty. (Although that one sounds kinda sexy, and if they happen to resource it in our direction, we'd certainly be grateful.)

Alternative Minimum Tax - We get to fill all the same forms over again, in case the government didn't get enough on the first round! How exciting!

Incidentally, as far as expenditures for mining exploration - and land clearing - we didn't have any, after, of course, deducting child support payments and elderly care credits from Section 1245 property and the applicable percentage of payments excluded from income under section 126. We probably would have, except we recaptured the amounts under section 179 and 280F(b)(2). In case you were wondering.

Passive Activity Loss Limitations - Is this, like, when Steve comes to the office and pretty much just hangs out? Do we get a deduction for that?


Well, we were hoping to delight, comfort, and inspire you with our blow-by-blow account, but, since we started this 7 hours ago, we better focus on finishing up. More power to tax protesters and everything, but we've got no great desire to go to prison and get intimate with Julio and Big Jack.

Tell us again; is there a fee for filing an extension?


OUTRAGEOUS FACTOID!

Think the rich don't pay their share of taxes? Think again. Here are the facts, according to the IRS:

  • In 1997, the most recent year for which data is available, those in the top 1% of income paid a third of all federal income taxes.
  • Those in the highest 5% of income paid just over half (52%) of all income taxes.
  • The top 10% paid 63% of all income tax.
  • Those whose income was in the bottom 50% paid only 4% of federal income taxes.


Rageback:

Share your thoughts about your income tax return - was it simpler this year? Did you pay more or less than in previous years? What part of the process do you find most outrageous?

Click here to read what others have to say


Free Outrages By E-mail!

More...


© Copyright 1996-98, The Outrage is produced by Athens New Media. All rights reserved.